April Drake, AIA was recently honored by the APELSCIDLA board for her service by Jim Kelly, PE, current chair of APELSCIDLA.
The Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers and Landscape Architects (APELSCIDLA Board) examines, licenses, and regulates approximately 35,000 individuals and related business entities in Virginia.
If you are interested in serving on this board, please email Paul Battaglia, AIA at pbattaglia@aiava.org
The AIA Virginia PAC is one of the sharpest tools in our advocacy toolkit. The AIA Virginia PAC Award celebrates the engagement and commitment of a local AIA component that supports the advancement and mission of the PAC. The winning component goes home with $1,000 cash for Architecture Week/Month and the award trophy presented at Architecture Exchange East in November.
Current Leaderboard: AIA Blue Ridge – 80 points AIA Hampton Roads – 60 points (only Board of Directors at 100%) AIA Richmond – 30 points AIA Central Virginia – 20 points AIA Northern Virginia – 0 points
Points are accrued in three areas: local component Board participation, the percentage of local component’s membership who have invested in the PAC, and the total amount of money invested by the members of the local component.
Points are allocated as follows:
Local component Board participation a. Did 100% of the Board of Directors invest in the AIA Virginia PAC? i. Yes = 20 points ii. No = 0 points
Percentage of local component members who have invested in the AIA Virginia PAC i. Component with highest % = 40 points ii. Component with second highest % = 20 points iii. Component with third highest % = 10 points
Average investment per member from the total local component membership i. Component with highest average investment/member = 40 points ii. Component with second highest average investment/member = 30 points iii. Component with third highest average investment/member = 20 points iv. Component with fourth highest average investment/member = 10 points v. Component with fifth highest average investment/member = 0 points
Scoring will be closed on Friday, October 13, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. EST.
Angelo Phillos of Richmond, Architect at Baskervill in Richmond has been appointed by Governor Glenn Youngkin to the Fair Housing Board.
Principal Angelo Phillos brings more than 25 years of experience to his role leading Baskervill’s Mixed-Use and Multifamily studio. Known for his attention to detail and love of purposeful material selections, Angelo’s projects are both aesthetically and functionally superior. With a solution-based approach to design leadership and a congenial teamwork attitude, Angelo is a favorite among his clients and colleagues alike. He holds a Bachelor of Architecture from Virginia Tech.
The AIA Virginia PAC is one of the sharpest tools in our advocacy toolkit. The AIA Virginia PAC Award celebrates the engagement and commitment of a local AIA component that supports the advancement and mission of the PAC. The winning component goes home with $1,000 cash for Architecture Week/Month and the award trophy presented at Architecture Exchange East in November.
Current Leaderboard: AIA Hampton Roads – 90 points (only Board of Directors at 100%) AIA Blue Ridge – 60 points AIA Central Virginia – 20 points AIA Richmond – 20 points AIA Northern Virginia – 0 points
Points are accrued in three areas: local component Board participation, the percentage of local component’s membership who have invested in the PAC, and the total amount of money invested by the members of the local component.
Points are allocated as follows:
Local component Board participation a. Did 100% of the Board of Directors invest in the AIA Virginia PAC? i. Yes = 20 points ii. No = 0 points
Percentage of local component members who have invested in the AIA Virginia PAC i. Component with highest % = 40 points ii. Component with second highest % = 20 points iii. Component with third highest % = 10 points
Average investment per member from the total local component membership i. Component with highest average investment/member = 40 points ii. Component with second highest average investment/member = 30 points iii. Component with third highest average investment/member = 20 points iv. Component with fourth highest average investment/member = 10 points v. Component with fifth highest average investment/member = 0 points
Scoring will be closed on Friday, October 13, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. EST.
The AIA Virginia PAC is one of the sharpest tools in our advocacy toolkit. The AIA Virginia PAC Award celebrates the engagement and commitment of a local AIA component that supports the advancement and mission of the PAC. The Award is presented at Architecture Exchange East. AIA Central Virginia currently holds the trophy.
Points are accrued in three areas: local component Board participation, the percentage of local component’s membership who have invested in the PAC, and the total amount of money invested by the members of the local component. The winning component goes home with $1,000 cash for Architecture Week/Month and the award trophy.
Points are allocated as follows:
Local component Board participation a. Did 100% of the Board of Directors invest in the AIA Virginia PAC? i. Yes = 20 points ii. No = 0 points
Percentage of local component members who have invested in the AIA Virginia PAC i. Component with highest % = 40 points ii. Component with second highest % = 20 points iii. Component with third highest % = 10 points
Average investment per member from the total local component membership i. Component with highest average investment/member = 40 points ii. Component with second highest average investment/member = 30 points iii. Component with third highest average investment/member = 20 points iv. Component with fourth highest average investment/member = 10 points v. Component with fifth highest average investment/member = 0 points
Scoring will be closed on Friday, October 13, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. EST.
We have a strong tradition of advocacy at AIA Virginia.
There are many agents and elements in our advocacy toolkit.
The primary agents include the Advocacy Advisory Council, the PAC Board of Trustees, the Joint Legislative Committee, and our lobbyist Patrick Cushing.
Our activities include letters insisting on compliance with (and citing violation of) established selection and procurement protocols, legislative activities, regulatory activities, service commitments such as the Disaster Assistance Committee, and gubernatorial appointments to the APELSCIDLA Board, the Fair Housing Board, etc. No less importantly, they also include the engagement and commitment provided by each of us in our role as citizen architects.
In aggregate, these efforts seek to educate others on the value of our profession, shape and inform policy, advise on the implications of regulation and legislation, improve the conditions of practice, remove unnecessary barriers/impediments, and contribute to the safety and health of our built environment.
Our pride in our past and ongoing efforts is justified. Much has been accomplished.
Indeed, our members consistently rank advocacy, which is particularly appropriate to the state-level component, as a leading factor in determining the value of their membership. It gives us great pleasure to deliver that value.
And yet the field of play is ever-changing. Challenges and opportunities emerge constantly. Conditions and circumstances emerge and recede. The force and vector of the prevailing winds shift around the political compass rose.
There is little time for celebration. There is no time for complacency. Vigilance can ill afford respite.
We also owe it to our members to continuously improve the effectiveness and impact of our advocacy efforts. We need to be more intentional in determining and coordinating the effort appropriate to each of the seasons of advocacy; to consider when to clear, till, fallow, sow, tend, and reap.
And so, Ed Gillikin, Eliza Engle, Maggie Dunlap, Nicholas Wade, Rebecca Aarons-Sydnor, Sandra Leibowitz, Stephen Weisensale, Tim Colley, and William Abrahamson, joined Patrick Cushing and myself to assess the status of each of the elements and to begin to develop a comprehensive plan to better coordinate our advocacy efforts and to identify, vet, articulate, prioritize, establish, and achieve the planks of our advocacy platform.
The specifics of those proposed programs and procedures will require effort and attention. Information will be provided as they are developed. Ultimately, each and all of our councils, committees, and members can and should contribute.
I thank those who continue to participate in our advocacy efforts and to those who collaborated in the summit. If you would like to learn more about or contribute to our advocacy efforts, please contact Paul Battaglia at pbattaglia@aiava.org
(Clockwise from lower left) William Abrahamson, Rebecca Aarons-Sydnor, Sandra Leibowitz, Nicholas Wade, Eliza Engle, Maggie Dunlap, Patrick Cushing, Tim Colley, Ed Gillikin, and Stephen Weisensale at the 2023 Advocacy Summit; not pictured: Paul R. Battaglia. Photo courtesy of Paul Battaglia.
The Budget has not been resolved. The “Veto Session” is scheduled for 12 April. And the Governor could convene a special session. But many have already remarked that this General Assembly session was generally, and comparatively, “quiet”.
Even so, the bills concerning deregulation and universal licensure reminded us of the importance of remaining vigilant and the value of engaging a strong and effective lobbyist. (Great work, Patrick Cushing. Thank you.)
With more than a few high-profile retirements, with every seat in both chambers up for election, and with the possibility that some (perhaps many) of the seats will be filled by freshman legislators, next year’s session is anticipated to be far more “entertaining”.
We will be ready.
That durable readiness depends on not only recharging our PAC investments (donate to the PAC) but also organizing our efforts to educate legislators on the topics of Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS), the most appropriate mode of enacting requirements (through either the legislative or the regulatory process), and the unique and substantial ways that architects contribute to the built environment throughout the Commonwealth. If you are interested in collaborating on that effort, please read this item on the upcoming Advocacy Summit.
Are you a member of the PAC Board of Trustees, the Advocacy Advisory Council, the Virginia COTE Steering Committee, the HRC, the DAC, or the JLC? Do you serve as a gubernatorial appointee? Are you interested in actively participating in legislative, regulatory, or other advocacy activities? If so, please plan to attend the AIA Virginia Advocacy Summit on Friday 5 May in Richmond.
During this one-day event, we will survey and coordinate our advocacy efforts. This will be a working meeting. A brief introduction and update will be followed by collaborative planning sessions. The goal will be to develop a comprehensive strategy and determine how to make to most of each of the seasons of advocacy.
To sign up to receive additional details, and to pre-register for the event, complete the form below.
Architects are possessed of many skills and capabilities, amongst which we value technical expertise, including our command of the building code.
We do well to consider not only what the code is now, but also how it might be, and the impact of potential revisions. This expertise is valuable in both its direct application and as a form of regulatory advocacy.
If you possess or aspire to possess this expertise and would like to serve or discuss/suggest possibilities, please contact Paul Battaglia at pbattaglia@aiava.org.
While AIA Virginia did not propose any legislation in the Virginia General Assembly this year, we have been vigilant in monitoring the bills that were proposed by others. When proposed legislation does, or might, affect us, we have developed an appropriate response: supporting or opposing those bills – or, in some cases, working to see that they are amended to our satisfaction.
Having just passed the midway point of Virginia’s legislative session – after which the bills “crossover” to the other chamber – we will remain attentive to the progress of the surviving legislation. We will monitor how each bill advances; whether it is passed, or amended, by the other chamber; how, if amended, it is resolved by a Committee of Conference; whether it is accepted, vetoed, or amended, by the Governor; and how, if amended or vetoed, it is received by the General Assembly.
In the meantime, we have a sizeable delegation headed to DC for AIA Leadership Summit 2023. Next week’s program includes sessions on Leadership, Advocacy, Engagement, and the role of the Citizen Architect. There will be opportunities to network with AIA members from across the country. And Hill Day will afford the opportunity to connect with our elected officials at the national level to discuss issues of interest to AIA nationally – as well as some items of local interest that could be affected by federal legislation.
There is certainly plenty of good work being done. I applaud those who are active in advocacy.
This work requires consistent action. It is never finished. It requires constant engagement, and education, at the local, state, and federal levels.
Soon after the current legislative sessions end, we will turn our attention to considering how we can better coordinate and organize our various advocacy programs and increase the impact of our legislative and regulatory activities. Stay tuned for additional information about that.
And please invest in the PAC. The PAC is a powerful tool in our advocacy toolbox. We will need your help to keep this, and all our tools, sharp.