Associated Thoughts: A Reflection on Craft and Design Forum XVI 

A few weeks ago, AIA Virginia and their Design Committee hosted the Design Forum XVI, focusing on [Un]Certainty: Reflections on Craft at the Cyber Frontier. The event and accompanying discussions, were both humbling and thought-provoking, as I sat with my peers to listen to the wonderful words of Dwayne Oyler, Ted Flato, FAIA, Billie Tsien, AIA, and Rick Joy, FAIA. The presentations were humbling, in that we were able to learn about truly beautiful pieces of architecture and design through the knowledge and insight of the guest speakers, but equally thought-provoking, as the presentations of work were followed by discussion and dialogue between the audience and speakers. Personally, I have always been a fan of architectural lectures, but something about this weekend’s event felt sentimental and wholesome, with colleagues from around the country gathering to reflect on past experiences and speak optimistically about the future of our field.

The first guest speaker, and moderator for the weekend, Dwayne Oyler, started his discussion by asking us all to define “craft”. A quick Google search will tell you that “Craft” is “an activity involving skill in making things by hand”. By definition this seems true, but yet… unsatisfying. Yes, there is value in craft by hand, but in a world where fewer and fewer things are made “by hand”, how do we as young architects strive to hone our own craft? Are there elements related to craft that can still be achieved using mouse and keyboard shortcuts in lieu of pen and paper?

I have had a few days since the Forum to sit and ponder my own definition of “craft”, both broadly and in its relationship to architecture. I am reminded of Billie Tsien’s comments, about the importance of being able to recognize “the hand” in spaces. Though this can refer to the physical presence of humanity, such as a beautifully hand-chiseled piece of stone, I think this can also apply to intentionality in detailing – in those precious moments of both perfection and flaw. Perfection, for example, when numerous planes and materials meet in a thoughtfully detailed manner and the heavens sing down at a corner! Or flaw, where the rigor of order and rules is broken to highlight something that could have otherwise been tucked away into the grid. As I start to define my own definition of “craft”, I find that my thoughts linger towards ineffable or intangible qualities that are evoked by human emotion. It is through these qualities – the touch of a worn handle, the smell of a space after it rains, or the sound of a room filled with people that suddenly goes quiet – that I think we can truly start to appreciate and sense the craft of humanity. When something – an object, work of art, or space, can evoke an emotional response, is this where we find true craft? And if so, is craft limited to humanity? Some of my favorite objects are not crafted by hand but are found rocks that have been shaped and worn by Mother Nature. My “pocket rocks” as I call them, kept safe in the various coats I wear throughout the seasons, are for all sakes and purposes “crafted” by my own definition – they evoke emotional responses each time I hold them and rub my fingers along their smooth and jagged edges. If Mother Nature is capable of craft (for we all know she has had years of practice), then the bigger question needs to be asked – is AI also capable of producing crafted objects? Or, can we consider the use of AI a craft of its own, synonymous with sculpting or woodworking?

I hesitate to even ask this, for the answer is a bit daunting. If the use of AI is in fact a craft, or AI can produce crafted things, does this mean that our roles of architects, designers, craftsmen, etc… will become obsolete? This thought forms pessimistic and yes, black-mirror-type scenarios in my mind. However, I am reminded of the hopeful optimism of our guest speakers. Of their belief in our innate need to feel and connect with humanity, with flaws, with intangible qualities. I do believe that there is craft to be found in using AI, but feel that this can only be achieved through the lens of the human spirit and mind. AI is, after all, another tool for us to use and take advantage of. It cannot achieve emotional connectivity without input from human ideas and design, without a sense of thoughtfulness, which in my mind, separates crafting from making. True thoughtfulness is developed and cultivated over years of experience – through trial and error, open-mindedness, an eagerness to learn, and above all, a sense of pride found in creating things through your own abilities and ideas.

All this rambling to say – craft is of the human hand, whether physically or metaphorically, and it is something we as architects and designers should strive to hone and personalize over time. Its definition holds different meanings to each of us but can be connected through a shared appreciation of perceived thoughtfulness.

Thanks for reading.
Ashleigh Walker, Assoc. AIA
Associate Director, AIA Virginia Board of Directors

An Advocacy Coda: Lessons Learned

Recently, and more than once, I was asked what lessons I had learned through the experience of our advocacy efforts during the recent General Assembly session. Excellent questions should not remain unanswered. My response is the following:

  1. No surprises
  2. There are no permanent adversaries
  3. Identify the opposition

A little more on each of those…

No surprises: Nobody appreciates being surprised; in real time, notoriously. Positions can and do change; they evolve, they often depend on specific circumstances, and circumstances are likewise prone to change. People understand that. But it is not fair to ask that they understand something that has changed from what they last were told, or worse yet, something that was willfully concealed. If you have made someone aware of your position – and you should never withhold a position if it is inquired after – and that position has changed from what you told them previously, you owe it to them to communicate that change.

There are no permanent adversaries: Those who are not with us are against us – kind of. Not so much actually. And even with those who may be staunch adversaries on one matter, we may be able to find a common interest on another. Best to remain opportunistic. A related maxim: there are no permanent victories. Best to remain vigilant.

Identify the opposition: It is important to identify, and recognize, those who oppose, or might oppose, your position; in advance, candidly. This information should be offered freely, along with a summary of the issue and your position. And this is best done pre-emptively: if you can offer this information before the other party inquires, so much the better. This offers the other party a chance to better understand what they are getting into.

I reckon those as three of the most impactful lessons that I learned; or had confirmed. I expect that learning to continue.

Paul Battaglia, AIA
Executive Vice President

P.S. An update on the results of the 2024 General Assembly session will be highlighted during an Advocacy Town Hall Meeting via Zoom from 3-4 p.m. on Wednesday, April 24. 1 LU (pending). Register here>>

Advocacy Update: at (very close to) the End of the General Assembly Session

Some rapid-fire updates on advocacy efforts…

An Advocacy Summit was held on Thursday, March 14. We spent the time reviewing our activities and discussing how we can more effectively pursue our interests at both the State and Federal levels. Thanks to all who participated. The fruit of those discussions will begin to emerge shortly.

Some of those opportunities to engage, along with an update on the results of the General Assembly session, will be highlighted during an Advocacy Town Hall Meeting via Zoom from 3-4 p.m. on Wednesday, April 24. 1 LU (pending) Register here>> https://www.aiava.org/event/advocacy-town-hall/

The Joint Legislative Committee (the JLC; composed of members from AIA Virginia and ACEC Virginia) did a great job marshaling the bills. We’ll review the outcome more fully during the Advocacy Town Hall. But here are some bills that we supported, have passed, and are due to become law on July 1, 2024:

  • Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits (HB 960, SB 556): increases the maximum credit per year from $5M to $7.5M (without establishing an annual cap on the overall program)
  • Single Stair Study (HB 368, SB 195): directs DHCD to convene an advisory group to study the possibility of allowing Group R-2 occupancies to be served by a single exit in buildings not more than six stories above the grade plane
  • APELSCIDLA Quorum (HB 350): lowers the quorum requirement of the Board so that the progress of the Board is impeded less frequently

No advocacy update would be complete without a request to support the AIA Virginia PAC. Contributions can be made here www.aiavapac.org  

Newly Licensed

We understand the dedication and effort required to study for and pass the ARE. Congratulations to the following member for passing their exams and gaining licensure. This is great news that thrills all of us and we are so proud to call you an architect!

Scott Bennett, AIA (Northern Virginia)

Have you recently passed the ARE? Upgrade your membership to Architect using this AIA form. or send an email to your Member Services Director, Cathy Guske, cguske@aiava.org

Are you ready to get licensed? AIA Virginia has discounted 60-day Amber Book subscriptions. Read more about it here>>

Have questions about licensure? Contact AIA Virginia’s State Licensing Advisor, Gina Robinson, AIA, at gina.robinson@hdrinc.com

New Members

We are always excited to welcome new members to Virginia. The following members recently joined the ranks of AIA Virginia.

New Architect Members

Fanny Gonzalez, AIA (Northern Virginia)
Patricia Kettle Elzinga, AIA (Northern Virginia)
Jessica Lawrence, AIA (Blue Ridge)
Hee Lee, AIA (Northern Virginia)

New Associate Members

Kelly Antonios, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia)
Giavanna Cambeletta, Assoc. AIA (Blue Ridge)
Diego Cuadros, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia)
Aziz Ghani, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia)
Aimee Latour, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia)
Martin Neira, Assoc. AIA (Central Virginia)
Chau Nguyen, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia)
Shelley Ruano, Assoc. AIA (Richmond)

Transferred In

Keith Brockman, Assoc. AIA (Richmond) from AIA Georgia
Matthew Hill, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia) from AIA DC
Parul Jain, Assoc. AIA (Northern Virginia) from AIA Colorado
Alkananda Jakkaraju, AIA (Northern Virginia) from AIA Illinois
Sandra LaFontaine, AIA (Central Virginia) from AIA Ohio
Masoud Sharikzadeh, AIA (Northern Virginia) from AIA Massachusetts
Quentin Ward, AIA (Richmond) from AIA DC

New/Renewed Allied Members

Brian Hunt, Vice President, Keith Fabry
Hessam Nabavi, Promotions Director, Virginia Ready Mixed Concrete Association
Susan Pilato, CEO, Mantra Inspired Furniture
Kathy Blanchard, Senior Vice President, McGriff Insurance Services

View all of the AIA Virginia Allied members

2024 AIA Virginia Prize Winners Announced

During the first weekend of February, students across the Commonwealth participated in the 2024 Virginia Prize. For the first time JMU’s Architectural Design program joined competitors from perennial participants Hampton University, the University of Virginia, and Virginia Tech (Blacksburg and the WAAC) in addressing a challenge authored by Professor Stanford Britt, FAIA, Professor Carmina Sanchez-de-Valle, RA, and Associate Professor Marci Turner of Hampton University. The brief invited students to design a “bookless” public library as a community public room on a corner site at the intersection of N. Mallory Street and E. County Street in Phoebus, Virginia.

The submissions were juried by Trey Trahan, FAIA, NOMA, Robbie Eleazer, AIA, and David Sweere, AIA of Trahan Architects: a global architecture firm with offices in New Orleans and New York founded on the belief that the mindful design of everyday spaces can elevate the human experience. The practice is dedicated to creating spaces resonant with authenticity, cultural significance, and ecological resilience. The result is a harmonious portfolio that blends the arts, conservation, historic preservation, and social responsibility.

The juried noted that “The work was impressive for a single weekend charrette. There’s an attentiveness to the library’s functional role in the digital and post-digital age. The work as a whole offered an enormous range of solutions in form, materiality, and articulation.”

First Place was awarded to Graham Gewirz (University of Virginia).

“The scheme demonstrates a clarity in the development of the original diagram to the finalized solution. There is a consistency in the attitude and articulation of the natural thickness of masonry throughout the scheme, operating at multiple scales. Intelligent carving of the masonry creates places for gathering and engagement with the building from the exterior and intimate spaces for contemplation and studying in the interior.”

Second Place was conferred upon Philip Edmonston (University of Virginia).

“The scheme is strongly engaging of the site’s context, operating at a transition of scale in the urban fabric, by breaking down the scale of the overall structure into a series of volumes, aggregated into a composition that pulls a visitor into the site. The library expansion is complementary of the existing library in orientation, access, and form.”

Third Place was given to Kanako Kohara (Virginia Tech: WAAC).

“The scheme combines a muted natural material palette and access to nature with a beautiful simply articulated elevation. The use of exposed timber construction offers an example of forward-sustainable thinking.”

Mohammed Elabbasi (Virginia Tech: Blacksburg) merited an Honorable Mention.

“The scheme is inventive and playful in its articulation of a series of treehouse-like structures connected by a catwalk. It offers a youthful expression of lifted volumes to protect from flooding while creating a forest floor-like condition at the ground level.”

Many thanks to the jury for their diligent deliberations.

And Congratulations – not only to those who were recognized – but to all who submitted and, through their work, helped us to encounter new approaches and envision innovative possibilities.

View a gallery of the submissions below.

Unassigned Membership

Unassigned membership in AIA Virginia is intended for individuals who maintain active membership in another local AIA chapter and the national AIA but wish to keep abreast of and participate in AIA Virginia activities.

Unassigned membership entitles individuals to participate in AIA Virginia-sponsored events and programs at the member discount rate and to receive regular society notifications. Since AIA members are eligible to vote in only one AIA Chapter, unassigned members are not eligible to vote in AIA Virginia elections, hold a position on the Board of Directors, or represent the Chapter as a delegate to any meeting of the Institute.

The 2026 dues for unassigned membership are $272 for an architect joining between April and June 2026.

Payments to AIA Virginia are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes but may be deductible under other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

2026 Unassigned Membership

Application for Unassigned Membership in AIA Virginia

Name (of member for membership)(Required)
This is where communications from AIA Virginia and this membership confirmation will be sent.
Credit Card(Required)
American Express
Discover
MasterCard
Visa
Supported Credit Cards: American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Visa
Expiration Date
 
Billing Address(Required)

Gubernatorial Appointments with Secretary Gee

A Call for Service – and a Zoom Session on Gubernatorial Appointments with Secretary Gee

Many of our members currently serve in positions that require appointment by the Governor. Gratitude and appreciation to those who have served and to those who are serving now: Angelo Phillos, AIA (Fair Housing Board), Lynden Garland, AIA and Anca Lipan, AIA (Art and Architecture Review Board), Jonah Margarella, AIA (State Building Code Technical Review Board), Paula Loomis, FAIA (Secure and Resilient Commonwealth Panel), and Helene Dreiling, FAIA and Tim Colley, AIA (APELSCIDLA).

In the near future, opportunities will be available to serve on the Art and Architecture Review Board and the APELSCIDLA Board.  Terms are anticipated to commence on 1 July 2024.

If you would like to know more about the opportunities, the eligibility requirements, and the application process, know that Secretary of the Commonwealth Kelly Gee will be joining us on Wednesday 27 March, from 2:30 to 3 PM.

Register for the online session here>> 

Now onto the Senate: Pressing for a Fix to the Amortization of the R&D Tax Credits

Two urgent dates concerning AIA members are approaching. The first is March 22nd when the Congress must pass a second round of appropriations bills to fund the government and avoid a partial government shutdown. The second is April 15th when federal income tax filings are due.  

These two dates are important for action on HR 7024, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024. This bill can either be added to the government funding bills being considered this week or brought up for a stand-alone vote in the United States Senate. Either result will head to the President, become law, and the IRS can begin to enact its provisions to benefit architects.  

AIA National is organizing a call-in campaign to urge the Senate to move forward and pass the bill without further delay. On Wednesday, March 20th, we are asking you to call your Senators and let them know you support the R&D and LIHTC provisions in the bill, briefly explain why these provisions are important to you, ask them to urge their leadership to bring the bill up for a vote, and ask them to vote in favor of the bill without amendments.  

Sample Call Script: 

Hello, my name is _____ and I am an architect in your state and a member of The American Institute of Architects. May I please speak to the staff person who handles HR 7024, the R&D tax bill, for the Senator?  

When referred to staffer: 

Intro: 

Reintroduce yourself to the staffer. I am calling today to ask Senator _____ to support HR 7024.  

Brief Talking Points: 

There are over 19,000 small, medium, and large architecture firms throughout the US. These businesses employ more than 200,000 individuals. Architects have a professional responsibility to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Investments in research and development are central to the day-to-day work of architects and drive local, regional, and national economies. AIA supports business-friendly tax policies that encourage investment in research and development, incentivize private-sector affordable housing, and ensure tax parity between large and small businesses. If Congress does not enact the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 (HR 7024), architecture firms of all sizes will be harmed. Firms will continue to be subject to unfair financial burdens that will result in job losses, firm closures, or restrict their ability to innovate, grow, and attract new talent.  

Ask: 

As an architect in your state and a member of AIA, I am asking the Senator to urge Senate Leadership (Senator Schumer and Senator McConnell) to bring the bill to the floor for a vote and for the Senator to vote in favor of HR 7024 without amendments that would delay the enactment of this bill. Does the Senator have a position on this bill? [Note and share the response with GovAffs@aia.org.] 

Closing: 

Thank you for your time and consideration of this important bill for architects in your state. 

Background 

There are over 19,000 small, medium, and large architecture firms throughout the US. These businesses employ more than 200,000 individuals. Architects have a professional responsibility to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. Investments in research and development are central to the day-to-day work of architects and drive local, regional, and national economies. AIA supports business-friendly tax policies that encourage investment in research and development, incentivize private-sector affordable housing, and ensure tax parity between large and small businesses. If Congress does not enact the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024 (HR 7024), architecture firms of all sizes will face undue restrictions on their ability to innovate, grow, and attract new talent.  

Key Provisions to Expire in 2025 

Research & Development Tax Credit  

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) requires businesses to amortize R&D costs over 5 or 15 years for domestic and international expenses, respectively. Prior to 2022, these expenses were fully deducted in the year they were incurred. Amortization adversely impacts businesses by increasing costs, negatively impacting employee retention, and new job creation, and limiting future investment in research and development. AIA supports HR 7024 changes that allow tax deductions of R&D expenses in the year incurred.  

Low-Income Housing Tax Credit  

LIHTC is the largest provider of new affordable housing in the United States, with over 2 million total units created and more than 110,000 affordable rental units constructed annually since its establishment in 1986. Congress sets a limit on the amount of LIHTC that can be allocated to states based on a per-capita formula. HR 7024 restores the 12.5% increase over this base allocation for 2023-2025 and lowers the tax-exempt bond financing requirement. AIA supports these changes which will fund more affordable housing developments. 

Please let the Federal Affairs team know if you have any questions by reaching out to GovAffs@aia.org.  

Thank you, 
Federal Affairs Team